From:
Scientific American Magazine - March 1998,
Pages 20-21
Unsound Reasoning -
Are Wind Musicians Loving Tropical Woods to Death?
At a recent conference on music and human adaptation at
Virginia Tech, physicist John W. Coltman demonstrated
what he first described in the early 1970s. After asking the attendees to divert
their eyes, he played the same tune twice on the flute. He then asked whether anyone heard any
difference between the two performances.
No one spoke up; the two were virtually indistinguishable. Then Coltman
revealed his trick. The first time he performed the tune, he played it on a
simple side-blown flute made of lightweight cherry wood. The second time he
used a flute of identical design, except for one detail: it was made of concrete.
To anyone
schooled in the physics of wind instruments, Coltman’s
point is old news. Whether the air is set to vibrate by an edge tone as on the
flute, by a reed as with the clarinet or by buzzing lips as with the French
horn, the sound itself comes from the vibrating air column inside the
instrument. This sound is produced through the end or through open tone holes,
not by vibrations of the instrument’s body, as is true of string instruments.
Dozens of
published reports, some dating back 100 years, converge toward the same general
conclusion: so long as the walls are thick enough to remain rigid—about 0.4
millimeter for metals, two millimeters for woods—and the inside walls are
smooth, the kind of material is, for the most part, immaterial. But to many
musicians, even a mountain of research remains unpersuasive. “We all know that wood flutes are much more
dolce, much sweeter,” says flutist Paula Robison. In contrast, “a gold flute sounds
like an instrument made of gold. The
silver flutes are much more perky.”
The
variation in timbre of wood and metal instruments stems from differences in
acoustic dimensions brought about by the manufacturing process, not by the materials
per se, says Robin Jakeways, a physicist at the
Materials
also differ in their ability to conduct heat and vibrations. “While those
vibrations may not affect the sound significantly, they certainly affect how
the instrumentalist interacts with the instrument,” Holmes explains. After
spending a premium for an instrument made of expensive material, it’s only
human to convince yourself that you must sound better. And, as flutist James
Galway points out, the workmanship of an instrument made of $70,000 worth of platinum
is likely to be of extraordinarily high quality. “People pick up my flute and
say, ‘This is better.’ Of course it’s better; it’s like getting into a
custom-built motorcar,” he says.
Whatever
the underlying reasons, the devotion of many musicians to rare or precious
materials could help contribute to their extinction. Dalbergia melanoxylem, known as M’Pingo,
granadilla (African blackwood)
and D. nigra, also
called rosewood or palisander, are considered
endangered, says Richard F. Fisher, a forest scientist at
Although
the demand for fine musical instruments might seem too small to inspire a
debilitating harvest of the rain forest, Fisher asserts otherwise. To get to
the remote regions where these trees grow, harvesters must clear rivers or build
roads. “In many of these areas there are so many landless peasants looking for
a piece of land to farm that after you remove just the few trees you want, they
go in and invade because now they have access,” Fisher says. “They cut down the
rest of the forest and start to grow crops.”
Fisher
adds that these tropical species are extremely difficult to raise
on plantations. They take 60 years or
more to reach maturity and tend to grow poorly when raised clustered together
in stands, as their key defense against predation is being scarce in the
forest. Indeed, an instrument maker in
Whether such innovations will ultimately be widely accepted by
music lovers remains to be seen. “Most musicians and many
listeners believe without question that the material of which a wind instrument
is made has a profound effect on its tone quality,” Coltman
remarks. “After 100 years, scientists have still convinced nobody.” — Karla Harby in